Search Frequent Questions

Filter By:

Active filters:

Remove all filters

Displaying 16 - 30 of 33 results

  • What does "electrical classification" mean?

    Equipment and wiring for locations where fire and explosion hazards may exist must meet requirements based on the hazards. Each room, section, or area must be considered separately. Equipment should be marked to show Class, Group, and operating temperature or temperature range. You must determine the appropriate classification for each…

    • Last published:

  • Applicability of prevention program for complex processes

    My process is a series of storage and process vessels, connected by piping, containing several regulated substances, with a few co-located tanks of other substances. Do I have to implement one prevention program to cover all aspects of the process even if different operators, different process chemistry, and different hazards…

    • Last published:

  • Does an owner or operator of a facility with a Program 3 process need to maintain Material Safety Data Sheets (MSDSs) under the risk management program regulations?

    An owner or operator of a facility with a Program 3 process must compile information pertaining to the hazards of the regulated substances in the process, including toxicity information; permissible exposure limits; physical data; reactivity data; corrosivity data; thermal and chemical stability data; and hazardous effects of inadvertent mixing of…

    • Last published:

  • What constitutes a revision of the PHA?

    The rule states that I have to update my RMP whenever I revise a PHA. What constitutes a revised PHA? Every time I go through management of change procedures I make a notation in the PHA file for the process, but would that constitute a revised PHA if the change…

    • Last published:

  • PHA revisions to consider offsite consequences

    If I need to revise a PHA to consider off-site consequences, when do I have to do that? In general, for a PHA originally completed to meet the requirements of OSHA PSM that did not consider offsite consequences, you should revise the PHA to consider offsite consequences when you update…

    • Last published:

  • SPCC compliance dates for farms

    What are the Spill Prevention, Control, and Countermeasure (SPCC) compliance dates for farms? On November 22, 2011, EPA amended the date by which certain farms must prepare, or amend, and implement their SPCC Plans to May 10, 2013 to comply with SPCC rule amendments promulgated since July 2002 ( 76…

    • Last published:

  • Hot Work Permit Review Date

    Stationary sources subject to the Program 3 Prevention Program requirements in 40 CFR Part 68, Subpart D, must include in their Risk Management Plan the date of the most recent review or revision of hot work permit procedures in Section 7.13. What date should the owner or operator enter in…

    • Last published:

  • Complying with process safety information (PSI) resulting from new and updated recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices (RAGAGEP)

    My Program 3 process was built prior to new and updated recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices (RAGAGEP) for my industry. Do I need to implement the new industry practices to comply with process safety information (PSI) requirements under 40 CFR §68.65? EPA expects owners and operators to regularly…

    • Last published:

  • Is EPA's PHA stationary source siting requirement analogous to OSHA's PSM?

    Does EPA interpret the Program 3 process hazard analysis - stationary source siting requirement analogously to OSHA's Process Safety Management standard? Yes. The requirement to consider stationary source siting during the process hazard analysis means that you should consider the location of the covered vessels and evaluate whether their location…

    • Last published:

  • What do I have to do for material and energy balances?

    For new processes, you must document both material and energy inputs and outputs of a process. For example, you would document the quantity of a regulated substance added to the process, the quantity consumed during the process, and the quantity that remains in the output. This requirement will not generally…

    • Last published:

  • PE certification and applying PE's seal

    Except as provided in 40 CFR §112.6 for qualified facilities, a Professional Engineer (PE) must certify a facility’s SPCC Plan. In order to certify an SPCC plan, must a PE apply his seal to the plan, or is the PE’s signature on a certification statement sufficient for SPCC purposes? For…

    • Last published:

  • Owner / Operator Compliance Audit Timeline

    The regulations in 40 CFR §§68.58 and 68.79 require the owner or operator of facilities to conduct and document compliance audits at least every three years, although an owner or operator is not required to conduct a compliance audit prior to submitting a facility’s first RMP. Must an owner or…

    • Last published:

  • Program Level 2 and 3 compliance audits

    Facilities with Program Level 2 and 3 processes must perform compliance audits at least once every three years (40 CFR §§68.58 and 68.79). How does a facility submit its compliance audit to EPA? Facilities are not required to submit three year compliance audits to EPA; however, facilities should maintain records…

    • Last published:

  • Maintenance requirements for leased tanks

    I use propane as a raw material in my manufacturing process. I lease the tank from the propane supplier. The supplier does all the maintenance. My staff never work on the equipment. What should I do? As part of your contract with the supplier, it would be helpful to gain…

    • Last published:

  • When must an incident investigation be initiated for Program 2 and 3 processes?

    When must a stationary source owner or operator begin conducting incident investigations as required under 40 CFR §68.60 (for Program 2 processes) or 40 CFR §68.81 (for Program 3 processes)? For both Program 2 and Program 3 processes, the incident investigation must be initiated as soon as possible, but not…

    • Last published: