Search Frequent Questions

Displaying 1 - 13 of 13 results

• Redoing calculations if RMP*Comp is updated

  Will RMP*Comp be updated? If so, would I have to redo calculations I might already have made with an earlier version? No, you do not have to redo your work if you have already completed your consequence analyses. RMP*Comp is based on the EPA's Offsite Consequence Analysis Guidance (OCA Guidance)…

  • Last published: May 22, 2024

• Different distances to toxic endpoints with different versions of RMP*Comp

  I've noticed that for certain chemicals, RMP*Comp gives substantially different distances to the toxic endpoint than previous versions. Why? In the current version of RMP*Comp, we have incorporated new chemical-specific distance tables for ammonia, chlorine, and sulfur dioxide. The generic tables are still used for other chemicals (you can see…

  • Last published: May 22, 2024

• Distance to endpoint calculations used by RMP*Comp

  Does RMP*Comp perform some math or modelling in order to arrive at an endpoint distance, or is it simply interpolating from the tables in the EPA's Offsite Consequence Analysis Guidance (OCA Guidance)? RMP*Comp follows the procedures set out in the OCA Guidance . This means that for some scenarios, the…

  • Last published: May 22, 2024

• Please clarify whether oxygenates blended into either conventional gasoline or Reformulated Blendstock for Oxygenate Blending (RBOB) downstream of the refinery need to be included in sulfur compliance calculations.

  See More Frequent Questions about Fuels Registration, Reporting, and Compliance Help . Section 80.205(c) provides that a refiner or importer may include oxygenates added downstream from the refinery or import facility if the requirements under § 80.69(a) or § 80.101(d)(4)(ii) of the RFG/CG regulations are met. Therefore, a refiner or…

  • Last published: August 2, 2024

• In the NPRM, the sulfur standards were expressed without decimal places, but the final rule provides that the standards are expressed with two decimal places (§§ 80.195, 205). Why did EPA include this change?

  See More Frequent Questions about Fuels Registration, Reporting, and Compliance Help . EPA included the decimal places to ensure that the sulfur standards are not exceeded by rounding down actual average sulfur levels. We do not believe reporting the average sulfur level to two decimals creates any additional burden as…

  • Last published: July 15, 2024

• It is our understanding that, if a portion of the gasoline produced by a refinery located within the GPA is sold outside of the United States, that gasoline is not subject to the sulfur standards and it only has to meet the standards of the country to whi

  See More Frequent Questions about Fuels Registration, Reporting, and Compliance Help . Gasoline that is exported for sale outside the United States is not subject to the requirements of the gasoline sulfur rule, including gasoline produced by a refiner located within the GPA. See § 80.200(c).

  • Last published: July 15, 2024

• 6. Is commingling of different types of ethanol permitted? If so, what systems must be employed?

  See More Frequent Questions about Fuels Registration, Reporting, and Compliance Help . With one exception, the RFS program places no restrictions on the mixing of ethanol produced in different facilities, by different feedstocks, or through different processes. Also, RINs assigned to ethanol are fungible, in that a specific assigned RIN…

  • Last published: July 15, 2024

• If a facility is grandfathered, is it also exempt from the requirement that feedstocks must be renewable biomass?

  See More Frequent Questions about Fuels Registration, Reporting, and Compliance Help . Even if a facility is exempt from the 20% GHG reduction requirement, in order to generate RINs, the facility is still required to use feedstocks that meet the definition of renewable biomass. The definition of renewable fuel in…

  • Last published: July 15, 2024

• RMP*Comp and emergency response

  Can I use RMP*Comp for emergency response? No. It's a planning tool. Many other tools are available for response, including ALOHA . You can learn more by reading CAMEO tools for RMP .

  • Last published: May 22, 2024

• Minimum and Maximum Distance to Endpoint

  The Chemical Accident Prevention Provisions require the completion of a worst-case release scenario analysis (40 CFR §68.25). This analysis includes estimating the greatest distance to endpoint as defined by the parameters in §68.22. Is there a required minimum or maximum distance for the distance to endpoint in the worst case…

  • Last published: May 22, 2024

• Is corn oil extracted from distiller?s grains and solubles (DGS) eligible for RINs under RFS2?

  See More Frequent Questions about Fuels Registration, Reporting, and Compliance Help . Biodiesel or renewable diesel made from non-food grade corn oil extracted from DGS that is made from renewable biomass is eligible to generate RINs. See Table 1 to 80.1426.

  • Last published: July 15, 2024

• Local meteorological data for alternative release scenarios

  For alternate release scenarios, RMP*Comp uses set values for meteorological conditions like humidity, wind speed, temperature, stability class, and so on. Is there a way to change those values? I want to use meteorology data from my own location. RMP*Comp indeed uses fixed values for certain atmospheric parameters, and does…

  • Last published: May 22, 2024

• Different results using ALOHA and RMP*Comp

  I tried running the same scenarios in ALOHA and in RMP*Comp. I got different answers. Why? The results you obtain using RMP*Comp may not closely match the results you obtain running the same release scenario in a more sophisticated air dispersion model such as ALOHA or DEGADIS. That's because of…

  • Last published: May 28, 2024