Single Source Determination
Date | Title | EPA Office | Author | Issues Addressed |
---|---|---|---|---|
04/24/1980 | PSD Applicability Determination | SSCD | Reich, Edward | Whether two independent facilities can be considered part of the same source when they are located on adjacent properties and are owned by the same persons. |
07/17/1980 | PSD Applicability: TEX-USS High Density Polyethylene Plant | SSCD | Reich, Edward | Whether a proposed TEX-USS Polyethylene plant and the U.S.S. Novamont are under common control. |
03/09/2009 | Alcoa Massena Modernization Project and Request for a Single Source Determination | Region 2 | Riva, Steven | Whether two plants are on contiguous or adjacent properties. |
02/12/2020 | EPA's Response to Eastman Chemical Company's Request that EPA Reconsider Prior Source Determinations | Region 3 | Fernandez, Cristina | Whether EPA should apply the Meadowbrook Letter framework to reconsider past EPA letters concerning whether three chemical corporations are under common control |
02/11/1998 | Feb. 11, 1998 Letter to Terry Godar on MSW Landfills | Region 3 | Morris, Makeba | Whether a landfill and landfill gas collection system are under common control, among other issues. |
11/26/2019 | Interpreting "Adjacent" for New Source Review and Title V Source Determinations in All Industries Other Than Oil and Gas | OAR | Idsal, Anne L. | Interpretation of “adjacent” for all industrial categories except for oil and natural gas activities. |
07/23/2019 | 2019 Jaques Compressor Station Common Source Determination | Region 8 | Daly, Carl | Whether two entities at a natural gas compressor station are under common control. |
08/27/1996 | Analysis of the Applicability of PSD to the Anheuser-Busch, Incorporated Brewery and Nutri-Turf, Incorporated Landfarm at Fort Collins, Colorado | OAQPS | Kellam, Robert | Whether a brewery and landfarm are on contiguous or adjacent properties and share a major industrial grouping (or a support facility relationship). |
08/02/1996 | Major Source Determinations for Military Installations Under the Air Toxics, New Source Review, and Title V Operating Permit Programs of the Clean Air Act (Act) | OAQPS |
Seitz, John |
Whether operations within military installations should be considered to be under common control and share a major industrial grouping (or a support facility relationship). |
05/19/1999 | Region 4 | Smith, Winston | Whether two bulk gasoline terminals are on contiguous or adjacent properties. | |
01/28/2000 | Applicability of PSD Permitting Requirements, Wellcraft Marine Corporation, Sarasota, Florida | Region 4 | Neeley, Douglas R. | Whether two boat manufacturing operations are on contiguous or adjacent properties. |
04/14/2006 | Single Source Determination for General Dynamics | Region 5 | Blakely, Pamela | Whether multiple weapons manufacturing operations are on contiguous or adjacent properties. |
09/22/2009 | Withdrawal of William Wehrum's January 12, 2007 Issued Guidance Memo "Source Determinations for Oil and Gas Industries" | OAR | McCarthy, Gina | Withdrawal of memo concerning major source determinations for the oil and gas industry. |
01/12/2007 | Source Determinations for Oil and Gas Industries | OAR | Wehrum, William | [Withdrawn] Guidance related to major stationary source determinations for the oil and gas industry. |
07/15/1997 | July 15, 1997 Region V Letter on LTV Steel, Stein, Inc., and Allega, Inc. | Region 5 | Newton, Cheryl | Whether three steel production and processing facilities are under common control and have a support facility relationship. |
08/08/1997 | target="_blank"Great Salt Lake Minerals Source Determination | Region 8 | Long, Richard | Whether a pump station and minerals plant share a major industrial grouping (or a support facility relationship) and are on contiguous or adjacent properties. |
05/21/1998 | Response to Request for Guidance in Defining Adjacent with Respect to Source Aggregation | Region 8 | Long, Richard |
Whether two Utility Trailer manufacturing facilities are on contiguous or adjacent properties. |
08/21/2001 | Permitting of Forest Oil's Kustatan Production Facility and Osprey Platform Pursuant to the Alaska SIP | Region 10 | Hardesty, Douglas | Whether an off-shore oil/gas platform and an on-shore production facility are on contiguous or adjacent properties. |
02/18/1987 | PSD Applicability Request, Valero Hydrocarbon Company Yoakum, DeWitt County Texas | Region 6 | Hathaway, William | Whether a hydrocarbon extraction operation and natural gas gathering and transmission operations share a major industrial grouping (or a support facility relationship). |
08/07/1997 | ESCO Corp. Source Determination | Region 10 | Cabreza, Joan | Whether two metal castings plants are on contiguous or adjacent properties and share a major industrial grouping (or a support facility relationship). |
10/16/2018 | Are JCL and Ameresco Under Common Control | OAQPS | Wood, Anna Marie | Whether a landfill and a landfill gas-to-energy operation are under common control. |
04/30/2018 | Meadowbrook Energy and Keystone Landfill Common Control Analysis | OAR | Wehrum, William | Whether a biogas processing facility and a landfill are under common control, based on a new interpretation of the term “control.” |
02/01/2018 | Pacific Ethanol, One or More Sources? | Region 7 | Weber, Rebecca | Whether two ethanol production facilities and a grain operation are on contiguous or adjacent properties and share a major industrial grouping (or a support facility relationship). |
10/11/2000 | St. Lawrence Cement... Two Facilities or One? | Region 2 | Riva, Steven | Whether two cement manufacturing operations are on contiguous or adjacent properties and share a major industrial grouping (or a support facility relationship). |
09/18/1995 | Common Control, September 18, 1995 Letter to Peter Hamlin | Region 7 | Spratlin, William | Whether new facilities that locate on the site of an existing major stationary source should be considered to be under common control. |
10/18/2010 | Summit Petroleum Corporation Single Source Determination | Region 5 | Newton, Cheryl | [Vacated] Whether sour gas wells, a sweetening plant, and associated flares are on contiguous or adjacent properties. |
08/25/1999 | Support Facility Determination... Oscar Mayer and Madison Gas & Electric | Region 5 | Miller, Robert | Whether six electric generating units and a food facility share a major industrial grouping (or a support facility relationship) and are under common control. |
08/08/2001 | Should DuPont and DUSA International be Considered a Single Source for Title V and PSD | Region 4 | Neeley, R. Douglas | Whether different portions of a chemical manufacturing complex are under common control. |
03/29/2001 | Single Source Determination for Gallitan Steel Co. and Heckett MultiServ | OAQPS | Thomas, Henry and Seitz, John | Whether a steel manufacturing facility and slag processing facility are under common control and share a major industrial grouping (or a support facility relationship). |
10/01/1999 | Source Definition Issue for KN Power - Front Range Energy Associates, LLC/PSCo Generating Facility | Region 8 | Long, Richard | Whether two power generating facilities are under common control. |
05/16/1980 | Shell Oil Company Wilmington Complex Specification of Source | SCCD | Reich, Edward | Whether portions of a refinery complex are on contiguous or adjacent properties. |
11/12/1998 | Single Source Determination for Coors/TriGen | Region 8 | Long, Richard | Whether a power plant and a brewery are under common control and share a major industrial grouping (or a support facility relationship). |
12/06/2004 | Lincolnway Energy Cooperative & Co-location with Existing Grain Cooperative | Region 7 | Heiman, JoAnn | |
07/03/2001 | PSD Question Concerning Common Control, Alliant Energy and Climax Molybdenum | OAQPS | Seitz, John | Whether diesel-fired backup generators and a chemical plant are under common control. |
07/08/2004 | Outstanding Issues at the Al Turi Landfill in Goshen, NY | Region 2 | Kenny, Jane | EPA objection to issuance of a title V operating permit based on, among other things, whether the landfill and a landfill gas-to-energy operation are under common control. |
01/10/2012 | GPC Single Source Letter | Region 3 | Cox, Kathleen | Whether a landfill, landfill gas collection, and landfill gas-to-energy operations are on contiguous or adjacent properties and under common control. |
07/21/2005 | Single Source Evaluation for the Hartford Working Group and Premcor Distribution Center | Region 5 | Blakely, Pamela | Whether a remediation site and distribution center are under common control and share a major industrial grouping (or a support facility relationship). |
04/20/1999 | American Soda Multi-facility Source Determination | Region 8 | Long, Richard | Whether a sodium bicarbonate mine and processing plant are on contiguous or adjacent properties. |
05/01/2002 | Common Control for Maplewood Landfill and Industrial Power Generating Corporation | Region 3 | Katz, Judith | Whether a landfill and landfill gas-to-energy operation are under common control. |
08/11/1989 | PSD Applicability Determination for Multiple Owner/Operator Point Sources Within a Single Facility | OAQPS | Calcagni, John | Whether multiple operations at an airport are under common control. |
01/15/1999 | United Salt Northeast PSD Determination | Region 3 | Henry, Kathleen | Whether two salt processing facilities are on contiguous or adjacent properties and are under common control. |
Georgetown Cogeneration Project as a Minor Source | Region 3 | Turlinski, Bernard | Whether a cogeneration project at a university is under common control. | |
07/12/2019 | Are Manchester Renewable Power Corp. and Ocean Energy Corp Under Common Control | OAR | Idsal, Anne L. | Whether a landfill and landfill gas-to-energy operations are under common control. |
03/25/2016 | Central Landfill Source Determination | Region 1 | Moraff, Ken | Whether a landfill, gas collection and control system, and landfill gas-to-energy operations share a major industrial grouping (or a support facility relationship) and are under common control. |
12/21/2012 | Applicability of the Summit Decision to EPA Title V and NSR Source Determinations | OAQPS | Page, Stephen | [Vacated] Explanation of the decision by the 6th Circuit Court of Appeals to vacate and remand a title V applicability determination made by the EPA for Summit Petroleum’s oil and gas operations in Michigan. |
12/16/2011 | PowerSecure Common Control Determination | Region 4 | Worley, Gregg | Whether a landfill and landfill gas-to-energy operations are under common control. |
08/09/2017 | Source Determination Analysis for River Bend Dehydrator Site | Region 8 | Wortman, Eric | Whether certain emission units in the oil and natural gas sector are adjacent based on the definition of “surface site” and “shared equipment.” |
06/30/1981 | PSD Definition of Source | SSCD | Reich, Edward | Whether two automobile manufacturing operations are on contiguous or adjacent properties. |
10/18/2010 | BP American Production Company's Florida River Compression Facility Single Source Determination | Region 8 | Videtich, Callie |
Whether gas wells and a compression stations share a major industrial grouping (or a support facility relationship) and are on contiguous or adjacent properties. |
03/16/1979 | Definition of Source | SSCD | Reich, Edward | Whether a paper mill and a chemical plant are under common control. |
05/11/2009 | Common Control Determination for Ocean County Landfill and the Manchester Renewable Power Corp./LES | Region 2 | Borsellino, Ronald | Whether a landfill and landfill gas-to-energy operations are under common control. |
07/20/1995 | Site Specific Determination of Common Control United Technologies Corporation; Columbus G.A. | Region 4 | Harper, Jewell | Whether two manufacturing operations are under common control. |
06/05/1995 | Watts Bar Nuclear Plant Title V Applicability | Region 4 | Harper, Jewell | Whether a nuclear plant and fossil-fired power plant share a major industrial grouping, are on contiguous or adjacent properties, and are under common control. |
04/05/1995 | 4/5/95 Letter on Definition of Major Source | Region 2 | Eng, Kenneth | Whether multiple different operations associated with different five examples should be considered to be under common control. |
03/13/1998 | Guidance on Major Modification Provisions of PSD Rules as Applied to "Re-Permitting" at Acme Steel Co. | Region 5 | Newton, Cheryl | Whether two steel mills are on contiguous or adjacent properties. |
Response to Appeal Dated May 21, 1992 From Reserve Coal Properties Company | Region 3 | Erickson, Edwin | Whether a coal mine and coal cleaning facility share a major industrial grouping (or a support facility relationship), among other issues. |
Related Topics: Stationary Source of Air Pollution
Return to Policy & Guidance Document Index
The “Relevant Guidance” index includes a collection of documents issued by EPA organized by topic area. These documents include memoranda, letters, orders, and other types of EPA actions that may provide guidance in one or more forms, such as an adjudication, statement of policy, interpretation of statutes or regulations, or technical information. Each collection is intended to be representative of EPA statements on the topic, but it may not be a complete listing of such statements. The collection does not reflect topic-specific statements that have been expressed by EPA though published rule preambles and Title V petition orders, nor does it include EAB decisions. Each document in the collection speaks for itself, and the inclusion or exclusion of a document in the collection is not intended by EPA to communicate anything more than what is expressed within each document. EPA makes no independent representations on this website as to the extent to which any document in the collection reflects EPA’s current views on the topic, is a final action by EPA, or has any legal effect or precedential weight. Readers are advised to review the documents in the collection and conduct their own assessment of such considerations based on the content of each document and other documents in the collection. Some of the information or views included in the documents may be affected by subsequent changes to the referenced statutory or regulatory language or by court decisions. In addition, many of the statements in these documents are based upon the federal regulations which may differ from rules that govern federally-approved programs. Permitting authorities are advised to consult with their EPA Regional Offices if there is a question as to the relevance of a particular statement to their NSR program.