Conformity Adequacy Review: Region 9
State Implementation Plans (SIP) Submissions that EPA has Found Adequate or Inadequate
Region 9: Arizona, California, Hawaii, Nevada, and
the territories of Guam and American Samoa
For more information about adequacy review, return to the main adequacy page.
Contacts: Karina O'Connor, (CA, NV) at 775-434-8176 or
John J. Kelly, (CA) at 415-947-4151 or
Lindsay Wickersham, (AZ) at 415-947-4192 or
Michael Dorantes, (CA) at 415-792-3934 or
[email protected], U.S. EPA Region 9, 75 Hawthorne St., San Francisco, CA 94105.
Arizona
|
||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Area | Pollutant | SIP Submission | Finding (date budgets apply) | Additional Information/ Comments |
Ajo, AZ |
1987 PM10 |
maintenance plan |
Adequate (8/4/2020) Final FR (printed 8/4/2020 85 FR 47032) |
Budgets found adequate through the SIP approval process. |
Bullhead City | pm10 | limited maintenance plan | Adequate (8/26/2002) FR Notice |
Budgets found adequate through SIP approval process. |
Miami | pm10 | limited maintenance plan | Adequacy not completed on PM10 maintenance plan budgets. SIP submittal dated July 2008. | |
Phoenix-Mesa | 2008 8-hour ozone | attainment demonstration | Adequate (7/2/2020) FR Notice printed 6/2/2020 85 FR 33571 | Budgets found adequate through the SIP approval process. |
Adequate (6/13/2012) FR Notice |
Budgets found adequate through SIP approval process. | |||
1997 8-hour ozone | attainment demonstration | Adequate (11/9/2007) Letter FR Notice |
Budgets found adequate through the adequacy review process. | |
Nogales | pm10 | attainment demonstration | Adequate (9/25/2012) FR Notice |
Budgets found adequate through SIP approval process. |
2006 pm2.5 | maintenance plan and redesignation | Adequate (printed 8/15/2022) FR Notice | Budgets found adequate through the SIP approval process. | |
Payson City | pm10 | limited maintenance plan | Adequate (5/19/2014) FR Notice |
Budgets found adequate through the SIP approval process. |
Adequate (8/26/2002) FR Notice |
Budgets found adequate through SIP approval process. | |||
Pima County | carbon monoxide |
maintenance plan | Adequate (12/8/1999) Letter 1 Letter 2 FR Notice |
Budgets found adequate through the adequacy review process. |
Phoenix (Maricopa and Pinal Counties) | ||||
pm10 | 5% plan | Adequate (12/20/2013) Letter FR Notice |
Budgets found adequate through the adequacy review process. | |
Withdrawn (1/31/2011) Letter |
Budgets previously found adequate on the 7/1/08 FR Notice. | |||
attainment demonstration | Adequate (4/21/2000) Letter FR Notice |
PM10 budget for Maricopa County applies to entire non-attainment area including Pinal County. Budgets found adequate through the adequacy review process. | ||
Inadequate (12/27/1999) Letter FR Notice |
||||
Phoenix (Maricopa County) | carbon monoxide | maintenance plan | Adequate (3/3/2016) FR Notice |
Budgets found adequate through the SIP approval process. |
Adequate (10/14/2003) Letter FR Notice |
Budgets found adequate through the adequacy review process. | |||
attainment demonstration (serious area) | Adequate (11/1/2001) Letter FR Notice |
Revision to budget from 12/14/99. Budgets found adequate through the adequacy review process. | ||
Adequate (12/14/1999) Letter FR Notice |
Budgets found adequate through the adequacy review process. | |||
attainment demonstration (moderate area) | Inadequate (5/5/1999) | Determination made under old process | ||
Tucson | carbon monoxide | limited maintenance plan | Adequate (12/21/2009) FR Notice |
Budgets found adequate through the SIP approval process. |
Yuma County | pm10 | maintenance plan | Inadequate (6/16/2022) FR Notice |
Budgets found inadequate through the adequacy review process. |
Adequate (6/27/2007) Letter FR Notice |
Budgets found adequate through the adequacy review process; reversed by FR notice above (effective 6/16/2022). | |||
attainment demonstration | Inadequate (11/16/1999) Letter FR Notice |
|||
California
|
||||
Area | Pollutant | SIP Submission | Finding (date budgets apply) | Additional Information/ Comments |
Bakersfield Metropolitan Area | carbon monoxide | maintenance plan | Adequate (1/30/2006) FR Notice |
Budgets found adequate through SIP approval process. |
Chico Urbanized Area | carbon monoxide | maintenance plan | Adequate (1/30/2006) FR Notice |
Budgets found adequate through SIP approval process. |
Coso Junction | pm10 | Maintenance plan and insignificance finding | Adequate (8/13/2024) | Found adequate through the SIP approval process. |
maintenance plan | Adequate (9/3/2010) FR Notice |
Budgets found adequate through SIP approval process. | ||
East Kern County | 8-hour ozone | early progress plan | Adequate (12/10/2008) FR Notice |
Budgets found adequate through adequacy review process. |
Fresno Urbanized Area | carbon monoxide | maintenance plan | Adequate (1/30/2006) FR Notice |
Budgets found adequate through SIP approval process. |
Imperial County | 2006 pm2.5 | attainment plan |
Plan withdrawn (7/11/2017) |
|
8-hour ozone | early progress plan | Adequate (5/20/2008) Letter Enclosure FR Notice |
Budgets found adequate through the adequacy review process. | |
Indian Wells | pm10 | maintenance plan | Adequate (5/7/2003) FR Notice |
Budgets found adequate by virtue of SIP approval. |
2nd maintenance plan | Adequate (2/17/2023) FR Notice (pdf) (270 KB, January 18, 2023) |
Budgets found adequate through the SIP approval process | ||
Lake Tahoe North Shore Area | carbon monoxide | maintenance plan | Adequate (1/30/2006) FR Notice |
Budgets found adequate through SIP approval process. |
Lake Tahoe South Shore Area | carbon monoxide | maintenance plan | Adequate (1/30/2006) FR Notice |
Budgets found adequate through SIP approval process. |
Los Angeles (Coachella) | pm10 | attainment demonstration | Adequate (4/9/2004) Letter FR Notice |
Budgets found adequate through the adequacy review process. |
Adequate (4/18/2003) Letter FR Notice |
Budgets found adequate through SIP approval process. | |||
Inadequate (1/4/2000) Letter FR Notice |
||||
Los Angeles - San Bernadino Counties (Western Mohave Desert) | 8-hour ozone | early progress plan | Adequate (5/20/2008) Letter Enclosure FR Notice |
Budgets found adequate through the adequacy review process. |
Mammoth Lakes | pm10 | maintenance plan | Adequate (10/5/2015) FR Notice |
Budgets found adequate through SIP approval process. |
Modesto Urbanized Area | carbon monoxide | maintenance plan | Adequate (1/30/2006) FR Notice |
Budgets found adequate through SIP approval process. |
Portola | 2012 PM2.5 |
attainment plan |
Adequate (3/25/2019) |
2012 PM2.5 budgets originally posted for adequacy on May 8, 2017. Adequacy restarted on January 5, 2018 to include 2021 as well as 2019 and 2022 budgets. Budgets approved for 2019 and 2021 through the SIP approval process. |
Riverside County (Coachella Valley) | 8-hour ozone | early progress plan | Adequate (5/22/2008) Letter Enclosure FR Notice |
Budgets found adequate through the adequacy review process. |
2008 8-hour ozone | reasonable further progress | Adequate (4/12/2022) FR Notice (pdf) (198 KB, published March 28, 2023) |
Budgets found adequate through the adequacy review process. | |
Sacramento Metro Area | pm10 | maintenance plan | Adequate (12/8/2011) Letter FR Notice (PDF)(1 pp, 140K, published November 23, 2011, About PDF) |
Budgets found adequate through the adequacy review process. |
2008 8-hr ozone |
attainment demonstration and reasonable further progress |
Adequate (10/22/2021) |
Budgets found adequate through the SIP approval process. | |
1997 8-hr ozone | attainment demonstration and reasonable further progress | Adequate / Inadequate (1/29/2015) FR Notice |
Budgets found adequate through the SIP approval process. | |
Adequate / Inadequate (8/12/2009) Letter FR Notice |
Budgets found adequate / inadequate through the adequacy review process. | |||
reasonable further progress | Adequate (3/29/2006) Letter FR Notice |
Budgets found adequate through the adequacy review process. | ||
Sacramento Urbanized Area | carbon monoxide | maintenance plan | Adequate (1/30/2006) FR Notice |
Budgets found adequate through SIP approval process. |
San Bernardino County | pm10 | attainment demonstration | Inadequate (1/4/2000) Letter FR Notice |
|
San Diego Area | 2015 8-hour ozone | Attainment plan | Adequate (10/19/2021) San Diego 2008 and 2015 Letter (pdf) 86 FR 54692 (printed 10/4/2021) |
budgets found adequate through the adequacy review process. |
2008 8-hour ozone |
Attainment plan | Adequate (10/19/2021) San Diego 2008 and 2015 Letter (pdf) 86 FR 54692 (printed 10/4/2021) |
budgets found adequate through the adequacy review process. | |
reasonable further progress plan | Adequate (12/4/2017) Letter FR Notice (printed 11/17/17, 82 FR 54339) |
Budgets found adequate through the adequacy review process. | ||
1997 8-hour ozone | maintenance plan | Adequate (4/4/2013) Letter FR Notice |
Budgets found adequate through the adequacy review process. | |
attainment plan | Adequate (6/9/2008) Letter and Enclosure FR Notice |
Budgets found adequate through the adequacy review process. | ||
carbon monoxide | maintenance plan | Adequate (1/30/2006) FR Notice |
Budgets found adequate through SIP approval process. | |
San Francisco Bay Area | carbon monoxide | maintenance plan | Adequate (1/30/2006) FR Notice |
Budgets found adequate through SIP approval process. |
San Joaquin Valley | 2008 8-hour ozone | Attainment demonstration |
Adequate (7/14/2017) |
Budgets found adequate through the adequacy process |
1997 8-hour ozone | attainment demonstration | Adequate (3/01/2012) FR Notice |
Budgets found adequate through SIP approval process. | |
attainment demonstration and reasonable further progress plan | Adequate (2/6/2009) Letter and Enclosure FR Notice |
Budgets found adequate through the adequacy review process. | ||
2012 annual pm2.5 | Attainment Plan (Serious area) | Plan Withdrawn (10/27/2022) CARB requesting letter (pdf) |
||
Attainment plan (moderate area) |
Adequate (11/26/2021) FR Notice |
Budgets found adequate through the SIP approval process. | ||
2006 pm2.5 | attainment plan | Adequate (7/22/2020) Final Rule (printed 7/22/2020 85 FR 44193) | Budgets found adequate through the SIP approval process. | |
Adequate (5/2/2016) Letter FR Notice |
Budgets found adequate through the adequacy review process. | |||
1997 annual pm2.5 | attainment plan revision | Adequate (2/10/2022) Letter (pdf) FR Notice |
Budgets found adequate through the adequacy review process. | |
1997 24-hour pm2.5 | attainment plan | Adequate (1/28/2022) FR Notice |
Budgets found adequate through the SIP approval process. | |
1997 pm2.5 | attainment plan | no adequacy action | The 2018 Plan supersedes this past submittal. See May 9, 2019 letter from CARB to EPA. | |
attainment plan | Adequate (11/9/2011) FR Notice (PDF)(32 pp, 427 K, published November 9, 2011, About PDF) |
Regional insignificance finding for re-entrained road dust made through the SIP approval process. | ||
reasonable further progress and attainment plan | Adequate / Inadequate (5/27/2010) Letter FR Notice |
Regional insignificance finding for PM2.5 and NOx made through the adequacy review process. | ||
pm10 | maintenance plan | Adequate (11/12/2008) FR Notice |
Budgets found adequate through SIP approval process. | |
attainment demonstration | Adequate (5/26/2004) FR Notice |
Budgets found adequate through SIP approval process. | ||
attainment demonstration | Inadequate (5/5/1999) | Determination made under old process. | ||
Searles Valley | pm10 | attainment demonstration | Inadequate (1/4/2000) Letter FR Notice |
|
South Coast | 2006 24-hour pm2.5 (serious area) | attainment plan |
Adequate (10/12/2021) |
Budgets found adequate through the adequacy review process. |
2006 pm2.5 | attainment plan | Adequate (1/22/2018) Letter 83 FR 679 (Printed 1/5/2018) |
Budgets found adequate through the adequacy review process. | |
impracticability demonstration | Adequate (4/14/2016) FR Notice |
Budgets not acted on due to demonstration of impracticability. | ||
8-hour ozone | attainment demonstration | Adequate (3/1/2012) FR Notice |
Budgets found adequate through SIP approval process. | |
pm2.5 | attainment plan | Adequate (11/9/2011) FR Notice (PDF)(29 pp, 400 K, published November 9, 2011, About PDF) |
Budgets found adequate through SIP approval process. | |
8-hour ozone and pm2.5 | reasonable further progress, attainment plan, and out-year budgets | Adequate / Inadequate (5/30/2008) Letter Attachment FR Notice |
Budgets found adequate / inadequate through the adequacy review process.
The May 15, 2008 adequacy FR notice incorrectly stated that the 2017 NOx budget for the 8-hour ozone standard was 32 tpd. The adequate 2017 NOx budget for ozone is actually 232 tpd. This typographical error was corrected in a June 18, 2008 FR notice |
|
nitrogen dioxide | maintenance plan | Adequate (1/4/2010) Letter FR Notice |
Budgets found adequate through the adequacy review process. | |
maintenance plan | Adequate (4/9/2004) Letter FR Notice |
Budgets found adequate through the adequacy review process. | ||
pm10 | attainment demonstration | Adequate (4/18/2003) Letter FR Notice |
Budgets found adequate through SIP approval process. Budgets replace those posted on 06/24/99. | |
Stockton Urbanized Area | carbon monoxide | maintenance plan | Adequate (1/30/2006) FR Notice |
Budgets found adequate through SIP approval process. |
Ventura | 8-hour ozone | early progress plan | Adequate (5/20/2008) Letter Enclosure FR Notice |
Budgets found adequate through the adequacy review process. |
Nevada County, Western part, CA |
2008 8-hour ozone |
attainment plan |
Adequate (5/21/2021) Final FR (printed 5/21/2021 86 FR 27524) |
Budgets found adequate through the SIP approval process. |
Yuba City-Marysville | pm2.5 | maintenance plan | Adequate (9/9/2014) FR Notice |
Budgets found adequate through the adequacy review process |
Nevada
|
||||
Area | Pollutant | SIP Submission | Finding (date budgets apply) | Additional Information/ Comments |
Clark County (Las Vegas) |
8-hour ozone | maintenance plan | Adequate (2/7/2013) FR Notice |
Budgets found adequate through SIP approval process. |
early progress plan | Adequate (5/29/2009) FR Notice |
Budgets found adequate through the adequacy review process. | ||
carbon monoxide |
maintenance plan | Adequate (9/27/2010) FR Notice |
Budgets found adequate through the SIP approval process. | |
attainment demonstration | Adequate (12/15/2000) Letter FR Notice |
Budgets found adequate through the adequacy review process. | ||
Inadequate (2/17/2000) Letter FR Notice |
||||
Inadequate (5/5/1999) | Determination made under old process | |||
pm10 | maintenance plan | Adequate (10/16/2014) FR Notice |
Budgets found adequate through the SIP approval process | |
attainment demonstration | Adequate (1/26/2002) Letter FR Notice |
Response to Comments, Adequacy Review Table. Budgets found adequate through the adequacy review process | ||
Inadequate (11/16/1999) Letter FR Notice |
||||
Lake Tahoe | carbon monoxide | limited maintenance plan | Adequate (2/13/2004) FR Direct Final Rule |
Budgets found adequate through SIP approval process. |
Reno (Truckee Meadows, Washoe County) | pm10 | maintenance plan | Adequate (12/8/2015) FR Notice |
Budgets found adequate through SIP approval process. |
Adequate (6/2/2010) Letter FR Notice |
Budgets found adequate through the adequacy review process. | |||
carbon monoxide | second maintenance plan |
Adequate (10/31/2016) FR Notice (PDF)(10 pp, 278 K, published August 30, 2016, About PDF) |
Budgets found adequate through the SIP approval process | |
maintenance plan | Adequate (3/30/2006) Letter FR Notice |
Budgets found adequate through the adequacy review process. |